The following letter speaks for itself:-
Dear Sir,
As you are aware, I recently played a small but not unsensational part in the Dwarf Case. I flatter myself that I conducted myself more as an ardent supporter of a strong Navy than as a witness for or against anything in particular. I now learn that the case is to be tried again, owing to some technical flapdoodle or other. May I take this opportunity of stating as publicly as possible that, if I am called again, I shall to the best of my ability once more defend the Navy? What these dwarfs did or did not do is no affair of mine. To-day we are concerned with more important matters. For there can be no safeguard for the peace of Europe until our British-built warships lie keel to keel across every knot of the seven seas, and until every port of the habitable globe harbours a British submarine.
Yours faithfully,
Ewart Hodgson (Rear-Adml.)
Corrections to the blogosphere, the consensus, and the world
Thursday, May 27, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(151)
-
▼
May
(17)
- The Case of the Red-Headed Dwarfs, part 21
- Autres temps
- Invulerability comparatively cheap
- Couldn't resist
- Which I would have thought was the definition of '...
- What colour is puke?
- The Case of the Red-Headed Dwarfs, part 20
- Unlucky bastards, part 223 of a series
- Missed opportunity
- You, Sir, Are No Ingmar Bergman
- A little late, perhaps
- WTF?
- The Case of the Red-Headed Dwarfs, part 19
- Disturbingly plausible
- Pedobear with real claws
- Nigerian spam reaches Facebook
- Counselling, ptui
-
▼
May
(17)
No comments:
Post a Comment