Bryan Keon-Cohen objects to priests invoking the secrecy of
the confessional. Well, good, because if
he objects to professional secrecy he can do something about it. As a
barrister, he can renounce legal professional privilege, under which any of his
clients who happen to be paedophiles or a murderers or tax evaders can tell him
they did it without him having to report the confession to the authorities. Should
Australian secular society in the 21st century, that accepts the rule of law,
allow such practices to remain outside national legislative standards and
professional requirements? It’s true
that under such circumstances confessions would more or less cease, the clients
would lie, and the advice that Mr. Keon-Cohen would give would in consequence be
pretty useless, but given his expressed principles anything less would be sheer
hypocrisy.
Corrections to the blogosphere, the consensus, and the world
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment