Great Moments in Australian Politics
James Anthony Mulvihill
(1919-2000) (above), commonly known as Tony Mulvihill, was a popular Australian
politician. Between the years 1964 and 1983, when he retired, he was
a member of the Australian Senate as a Labor Senator for New South Wales. Having
started as a labourer for the railways, he worked his way up to crane driver
and official with the Australian Railways Union. He also served as
Assistant Secretary of the New South Wales Labor Party from 1957.
From the earliest, long
before becoming a Senator, he campaigned for better conditions for migrants and
their integration into Australian society, and for preservation of the
environment. His passionate attempts for a “green belt” around
Sydney resulted in waterways, beaches and parks being excluded from encroaching
private ownership by affluent landowners, a cause later taken up by persons
such as Jack Mundey.
On 14 December 1982,
Tony Mulvihill addressed the Senate during an Adjournment Debate, the following
extract being from Hansard. The speech is also quoted in Barry
Cohen’s book From Whitlam to Winston. Although it is
lengthy, it is well worth the read.
SENATOR
MULVIHILL (New South Wales) (10.30) - I rise on the adjournment to make some observations about a
well-produced book called The Ironworkers, which was written by
Robert Murray and Kate White. It deals with a very important segment
of the trade union movement . . .
I rise
primarily because an error appears on pages 286 and 287 of this excellent
publication. As a former official of the New South Wales Branch of
the Australian Labor Party, I want to correct this mistake. The
book discusses the torrid period during the struggle for control of this
union. It states that in 1965 the National Secretary of the
Ironworkers Union, Laurie Short, in an act of ‘compassion’ suggested that a man
named Ken McKeon should be given Australian Labor Party membership. I
used the word compassion. In that context, I want to develop the
saga of the McKeon family to indicate why Ken McKeon was not given
membership. I will be as quick as I can.
I take
the Senate back to my first dealings with the McKeon family, who lived in
Concord. My story has a small beginning. It began on a
Sunday morning. I had a fox terrier named Jeff. I know
that people such as Senator Douglas McClelland, who is a dog lover, will
appreciate this aspect. I went to my place of worship. The
three McKeon boys were in the churchyard. They were always
vicious. They took umbrage because my dog followed me into the
church. Whatever denomination people are, I do not believe it was
the end of the world because that inoffensive dog wanted to follow me into
church.
Ken
McKeon, who was the greatest degenerate of any member of the trade union
movement in New South Wales, laid my dog out with a brick. I picked
up a piece of three by two in order to even things up, because there were three
McKeon boys and only myself. It was unfortunate that, with the dog
lying in a pool of blood, the father of the McKeon boys, who was policeman,
threatened to arrest me. Of course, there was only one victor and it
was not me. I said to my mother: ‘One day I will even that up.’
I will
take the saga of the McKeon family a bit further. During the early
1950’s, Ken McKeon was one of Ernie Thornton’s henchmen in the Federated
Ironworkers Association. I state quite fairly that I do not have any
phobias if someone is a Marxist . . . . But the McKeons used
Catholicism, Marxism and toadying to the boss for their own ends.
I
started by saying that Ken McKeon was the greatest degenerate who was ever in
the trade union movement in Australia. I will illustrate this point
. . . . The modus operandi that Ken McKeon would use consisted of knocking on
the doors of delegates that he did not like, when he knew that they were out,
abuse their wives and then sometimes expose himself. That was the
sort of man he was. It did not end there. When he was an official of
the Ironworkers Union, he used his conscripted typists as his bedmates. It
was of all the more concern when it was well known that he used to attend the
VD clinic in Sydney.
I will
put this matter in clear terms. I know that the facts are sordid but
this must be said. I will give honourable senators the whole story
of Ken McKeon. When he left the Communist Party, of course, he
looked for somewhere else he could feather his nest. He ultimately
finished up as part of the boss class, as an industrial officer for the Chicago
Bridge Corporation. He then went toe Bernard Smith and subsequently
another firm. That is the saga of Ken McKeon. I know that
Senator Doug McClelland will agree with my comments. In 1965 Laurie
Short had a moment of weakness and suggested that Ken McKeon should be
forgiven. I believe in dealing with this matter on a sectarian line
. . . . The McKeon family, when they were not using Catholicism, were using
Marxism. Therefore in 1965, when Short suggested that he was a
reformed character, I said: ‘He will only get in over my dead body.’ He
never got in! . . . . I make that point deliberately
because when people read this book I do not want them to believe what is
written in error, namely that the super-degenerate, which is what McKeon was,
ever came into the Labor Party.
I now
want to deal with his two brothers because they were also assailants on my dog
and me.
SENATOR DOUGLAS McCLELLAND – Did the dog get better?
SENATOR MULVIHILL – He did and he lived for another seven years in spite of that
vicious attack. With regard to the other two McKeons, one joined the Democratic
Labor Party and the other had membership for a long while in the Australian
Labor Party. Let me give the Senate the reasons for indicting
them. They were more cunning. They were churchwardens in
the various parishes in the Catholic Archdiocese in Sydney. The
remarkable thing about them was that one Sunday they would go around with the
plate, but the next Sunday, if somebody else went around, it would be noticed
that there was more money on the plate. Honourable senators can draw
their conclusion that the McKeon family was the dregs of society. I
make that point because I believe in settling scores. So the situation
is that Ken McKeon was denied membership in the Labor Party personally by me
due to that vicious attack on my dog. But, apart from that, there
was no way, when we heard the other aspects of his sexual peculiarities and
other things, that he would be accepted into the Party.
I
commend this book The Ironworkers. It is an excellent
book. It is 99.9 per cent accurate. But the .01 per cent
remaining portrayed the low=grade people that the McKeons were. I
conclude by saying that I have kept faith. My dog’s honour has been
cleared. I say to the McKeon family: ‘I do not know what
part of Sydney you live in now; but I have squared the account tonight.’
Hansard, 14 December 1982
No comments:
Post a Comment